Remarkable Stability of Hairpins Containing 2‘,5‘-Linked RNA Loops
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We report here the results of a comparative study of hairpin loops that differ in the connectivity of phosphodiester linkages (3',5'- versus 2',5'-linkages). In addition, we have studied the effect of changing the stem composition on the thermodynamic stability of hairpin loops. Specifically, we constructed hairpins containing one of six stem duplex combinations, i.e., DNA:DNA ("DD"), RNA:RNA ("RR"), DNA:RNA ("DR"), 2',5'-RNA:RNA ("RR"), 2',5'-RNA:DNA ("RD"), and 2',5'-RNA:2',5'-RNA ("RR"), and one of three tetraloop compositions, i.e., 2',5'-RNA ("R"), RNA ("R"), and DNA ("D"). All hairpins contained the conserved and well-studied loop sequence 5'-...C(UUCG)G...-3' [Cheong et al. Nature 1990, 346, 680-682]. We show that the 2',5'-linked loop C(UUCG)G, i.e.,...C(3'p5')U(2'p5')U(2'p5')C(2'p5')G(2'p5')G(3'p5')..., like its "normal" RNA counterpart, forms an unusually stable tetraloop structure. We also show that the stability imparted by 2',5'-RNA loops is dependent on base sequence, a property that is shared with the regioisomeric 3',5'-RNA loops. Remarkably, we find that the stability of the UUCG tetraloop is virtually independent of the hairpin stem composition (DD, RR, RR, etc.), whereas the native RNA tetraloop exerts extra stability only when the stem is duplex RNA (R:R). As a result, the relative stabilities of hairpins with a 2',5'-linked tetraloop, e.g. ggac(UUCG)gtcc (T(m) = 61.4 degrees C), are often superior to those with RNA tetraloops, e.g. ggac(UUCG)gtcc (T(m) = 54.6 degrees C). In fact, it has been possible to observe the formation of a 2',5'-RNA:DNA hybrid duplex by linking the hybrid's strands to a (UUCG) loop. These duplexes (RD), which are not stable enough to form in an intermolecular complex [Wasner et al. Biochemistry 1998, 37, 7478-7486], were stable at room temperature (T(m) approximately 50 degrees C). Thus, 2',5'-loops have potentially important implications in the study of nucleic acid complexes where structural data are not yet available. Furthermore, they may be particularly useful as structural motifs for synthetic ribozymes and nucleic acid "aptamers".
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".