MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2019003622 · doi:10.1149/2.041205jes

Characterization of the PEM Fuel Cell Catalyst Layer Microstructure by Nonlinear Least-Squares Parameter Estimation

2012· article· en· W2019003622 on OpenAlexaff
Peter J. Dobson, Chao Lei, Titichai Navessin, Marc Secanell

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of The Electrochemical Society · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFuel Cells and Related Materials
Canadian institutionsNational Research Council CanadaBC Innovation CouncilAlberta EnergyUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsProton exchange membrane fuel cellAgglomerateNonlinear systemBiological systemLeast-squares function approximationElectrolyteEstimation theoryMaterials scienceRange (aeronautics)Non-linear least squaresCharacterization (materials science)Layer (electronics)ElectrodePolymerAlgorithmSet (abstract data type)Fuel cellsComputer scienceChemistryChemical engineeringComposite materialEngineeringMathematicsNanotechnologyStatisticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Models of polymer electrolyte membrane fuel cells (PEMFC) have become increasingly complex, using many parameters to define the behavior of species and the performance of the cell. A framework is presented here to couple an agglomerate electrode based, multi-dimensional, multi-physics mathematical model of membrane electrode assembly (MEA) model with an optimization-based nonlinear least-squares parameter estimation algorithm. The framework is used to estimate the micro-structural parameters of the catalyst layer such as agglomerate size. The results show that a set of data over a range of operating conditions can be accurately described by using a unique set of structural parameters that match experimental visualization of the catalyst layer. Extension of this methodology can be used to systematically estimate any model parameters in order to reduce uncertainty in model predictions. © 2012 The Electrochemical Society.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.245

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations73
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of The Electrochemical SocietySame topicFuel Cells and Related MaterialsFrench-language works237,207