Small Bowel Obstruction Due to Gastrointestinal Neurofibromas and Lipomas
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The most known manifestation of neurofibromatosis Recklinghausen NF-1 is cafe-au-lait spots on the skin, but up to 25% of patients with NF-1 have gastrointestinal manifestations, and only 5% of the gastrointestinal manifestations of NF-1 will require surgical treatment. We report a rare case of a 73-year-old woman, who five times earlier has undergone bowel resection, due to intussusception and ileus. The patient was admitted to the hospital due to abdominal pain. A computed tomography scan showed progression of the almost disseminated tumor growth of neurofibromas and lipomas of the small intestinal wall. Clinical manifestions showed the ileus required an operative treatment with a sixth small bowel resection. Small bowl obstruction caused by neurofibromas is a rare manifestation of a rare disease. J Med Cases. 2014;5(1):1-3 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4021/jmc1579w
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".