MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2019021634 · doi:10.1300/j186v03n02_05

Feeling Connected-Providing Computer Support, Access and Training to Patients in a Complex Continuing Care and Palliative Care Hospital

2003· article· en· W2019021634 on OpenAlex
Sharon A. Gigliotti

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hospital Librarianship · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicFamily and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
Canadian institutionsToronto Western Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOutreachFeelingPalliative careReferralNursingContinuing educationMedicinePlan (archaeology)Medical educationPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This article depicts the transformation of a traditional, staff-only library into a facility that promotes shared learning using technology for patients and families in a complex continuing care and palliative care hospital. The transition includes a new learning centre design and development of an outreach strategy, communication plan, integrated referral system, patient assessments and adaptations to meet physical needs, implementation of a teaching philosophy, and volunteer training. Individual patient stories illustrate how an interactive learning centre responds successfully to patient desires, their need to feel empowered and live a vital, engaged life in the hospital as home setting.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.033
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.090
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it