MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2019027784 · doi:10.1142/s0218127406016537

MULTIPLE BIFURCATION ANALYSIS IN A NEURAL NETWORK MODEL WITH DELAYS

2006· article· en· W2019027784 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Bifurcation and Chaos · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNeural Networks Stability and Synchronization
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPitchfork bifurcationCenter manifoldTranscritical bifurcationBogdanov–Takens bifurcationBiological applications of bifurcation theorySaddle-node bifurcationMathematicsBifurcation diagramBifurcationHomoclinic bifurcationHeteroclinic bifurcationPeriod-doubling bifurcationArtificial neural networkControl theory (sociology)Mathematical analysisApplied mathematicsHopf bifurcationComputer scienceNonlinear systemPhysicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A synchronized neural network model with delays is considered. The bifurcations arising from the zero root of the corresponding characteristic equation have been studied by employing the center manifold theorem, normal form method and bifurcation theory. It is shown that the system may exhibit transcritical/pitchfork bifurcation, or Bogdanov–Takens bifurcation. Some numerical simulation examples are given to justify the theoretical results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.607
Threshold uncertainty score0.326

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it