Encephaloceles of the Anterior Cranial Fossa
Bibliographic record
Abstract
From a total of 114 encephaloceles treated surgically at The Hospital for Sick Children in the 15 years to 1994, the case records of 17 patients with sincipital and 5 patients with basal defects were reviewed retrospectively. The condition was evident at birth in 64% of patients, while the remainder presented with either cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) rhinorrhea, nasal obstruction, or feeding difficulty. Hypertelorism affected 73% of patients. All encephaloceles were repaired transcranially, at a mean age of 2 years, usually by means of an intradural pericranial graft. Five children with gross hypertelorism underwent orbital translocation at the time of encephalocele repair. Of those not corrected, primary and secondary hypertelorism regressed in most instances where the encephalocele was treated before the age of 2 years. There were no deaths. The only case of CSF rhinorrhea occurred in a patient with a basal defect, in whom intradural repair was not possible because of adherence of diencephalic structures to the sac wall. Hypertelorism recurred in 1 patient after orbital translocation, requiring recorrection 2 years later. One patient with untreated secondary hypertelorism failed to regress after the encephalocele was excised at the age of 4 months. Developmental outcome was normal in 59% of children, whilst 18% have mild mental or physical disability, and 23% are severely impaired. A child with a sincipital or basal defect and mild hypertelorism should have the encephalocele treated in early childhood to allow the facial skeleton to remodel with growth. When an encephalocele is accompanied by gross hypertelorism or a facial cleft, one-stage correction can be undertaken safely in early childhood with minimal mortality and acceptable morbidity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".