MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2019031116 · doi:10.1159/000120952

Encephaloceles of the Anterior Cranial Fossa

2008· article· es· W2019031116 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePediatric Neurosurgery · 2008
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldMedicine
TopicHead and Neck Surgical Oncology
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHypertelorismMedicineEncephalocelerhinorrheaCraniosynostosisSurgeryCranioplastySkullAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

From a total of 114 encephaloceles treated surgically at The Hospital for Sick Children in the 15 years to 1994, the case records of 17 patients with sincipital and 5 patients with basal defects were reviewed retrospectively. The condition was evident at birth in 64% of patients, while the remainder presented with either cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) rhinorrhea, nasal obstruction, or feeding difficulty. Hypertelorism affected 73% of patients. All encephaloceles were repaired transcranially, at a mean age of 2 years, usually by means of an intradural pericranial graft. Five children with gross hypertelorism underwent orbital translocation at the time of encephalocele repair. Of those not corrected, primary and secondary hypertelorism regressed in most instances where the encephalocele was treated before the age of 2 years. There were no deaths. The only case of CSF rhinorrhea occurred in a patient with a basal defect, in whom intradural repair was not possible because of adherence of diencephalic structures to the sac wall. Hypertelorism recurred in 1 patient after orbital translocation, requiring recorrection 2 years later. One patient with untreated secondary hypertelorism failed to regress after the encephalocele was excised at the age of 4 months. Developmental outcome was normal in 59% of children, whilst 18% have mild mental or physical disability, and 23% are severely impaired. A child with a sincipital or basal defect and mild hypertelorism should have the encephalocele treated in early childhood to allow the facial skeleton to remodel with growth. When an encephalocele is accompanied by gross hypertelorism or a facial cleft, one-stage correction can be undertaken safely in early childhood with minimal mortality and acceptable morbidity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.846

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it