Electro-optical and SAR image fusion for improvements on target feature estimation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, tradeoff studies on several pixel level fusion algorithms and on their performance evaluation criteria are presented. Electro-optical (EO) and SAR sensors are dissimilar and produce images with very low degrees of correlation. These images are initially registered at subpixel level accuracy. The fusion is performed using the following pixel level fusion algorithms: Principal Component Analysis (PCA), Averaging (Ave), Laplacian Pyramid, Filter Subtract Decimate (FSD), Ratio Pyramid, Contrast Pyramid, Gradient Pyramid, Discrete Wavelet Transform (QWT), Shift Invariant DWT (SIDWT) with Haar, Morphological Pyramid, and the recent image fusion method developed by AUG Signals Ltd. A MATLAB based dedicated image fusion toolbox, that includes several pixel level fusion, restoration and registration algorithms, has been recently developed by AUG Signals. This toolbox is used for the tradeoff studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it