Thermobarometry and geochronology of the Uvauk complex, a polymetamorphic Neoarchean and Paleoproterozoic segment of the Snowbird tectonic zone, Nunavut, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Uvauk complex is an ultramylonite-bounded, granulite-facies suite of anorthosite–gabbro that forms part of the Chesterfield Inlet segment of the Snowbird tectonic zone. Following initial anorthosite–gabbro magmatism at ca. 2.71 Ga and a cryptic 2.62–2.60 Ga event marked by zircon and monazite growth, the Uvauk complex experienced two high-grade tectonometamorphic events at 2.56–2.50 and 1.91–1.90 Ga. Similar to the 2.56–2.50 Ga development of other shear zones in the region, the upper-amphibolite-facies to granulite-facies, moderately high-pressure (8.4–11.0 kbar and 705–760 °C) (1 kbar = 100 MPA) M1 event is interpreted to have involved the structural emplacement of ca. 2.71 Ga Uvauk complex rocks on ca. 2.68 Ga tonalitic rocks to the south. Granulite-facies, high-pressure (11.2–14.7 kbar and 695–865 °C) M2 metamorphism, gabbroic magmatism, and mylonite development within the complex at ca. 1.9 Ga culminated with ~3.5 kbar decompression at high temperature. Clockwise pressure–temperature–time (P–T–t) paths reflect crustal thickening, thought to be related to the early accretionary history of the Trans-Hudson Orogen. A thermal overprint at ca. 1.85–1.75 Ga resulted in retrograde metamorphism (5.8–6.0 kbar and 625–695 °C) associated with post-tectonic granitoid plutonism.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".