A re-evaluation of North American<i>Tephroseris</i>and<i>Sinosenecio</i>(Asteraceae: Senecioneae) based on molecular and micromorphological data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The recent transfer of the Queen Charlotte island endemic, Senecio newcombei Greene (Senecioneae: Asteraceae), to the Asiatic genus Sinosenecio extends the biogeographic range of Sinosenecio to North America and introduces a large amphi-Beringian gap in the distribution of the genus. However, the closely related genus Tephroseris includes a number of North American species with distributions in the vicinity of S. newcombei. We provide molecular sequence data from the ITS region of nuclear ribosomal DNA and micromorphological data from anther endothecial cells that indicate S. newcombei is closely related to North American Tephroseris species. However, the overall relationship between Sinosenecio and Tephroseris remains unresolved, so that transfer of S. newcombei to Tephroseris is not proposed.Key words: Tephroseris, Sinosenecio, phylogeny, ITS, anther endothecial cells.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".