MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2019090234 · doi:10.1353/gpq.2014.0068

Decolonize Me by Heather Igloliorte, Brenda L. Croft, and Steve Loft (review)

2014· article· en· W2019090234 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Anne Whitelaw

Bibliographic record

VenueGreat plains quarterly · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicCultural Heritage Management and Preservation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExhibitionIndigenousArt historyWitnessVisual artsHistoryArtSociologyMedia studiesLawPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Decolonize Me by Heather Igloliorte, Brenda L. Croft, and Steve Loft Anne Whitelaw Decolonize Me. By Heather Igloliorte, Brenda L. Croft, and Steve Loft. Ottawa: Ottawa Art Gallery, 2012. 157 pp. Photographs. C$30.00 paper. Playing off the popular 2004 film Supersize Me, which followed filmmaker Morgan Spurlock’s thirty- day fast food diet, the catalogue Decolonize Me (Ottawa Art Gallery, 2012) inverts the passive stance uncovered by Spurlock’s exploration of North American consumption habits and calls on indigenous artists, writers, and activists to determine their place in contemporary society by decolonizing its institutions and methodologies. Heather Igloliorte (Inuit), an assistant professor of art history at Concordia University in Montreal, curated the exhibition, which featured the work of six indigenous artists: Sonny Assu (Ligwilda’xw), Jordan Bennett (Mi’kmaw), Cheryl L’Hirondelle (Métis/Cree/German), Nigit’stil Norbert (Gwich’in), Barry Pottle (Inuit), and Bear Witness (Cayuga). The catalogue presents the work accompanied by the artists’ statements in English, French, and the artist’s traditional language alongside essays by Igloliorte, Australian curator and writer Brenda Croft (Gurindji/Malngin/Mudpurra) and curator and art historian Steven Loft (Mohawk). A rarity some twenty years ago when both the National Gallery of Canada and the Canadian Museum of Civilization presented Land Spirit Power and Indigena as critical responses to the Columbus quincentenary, exhibitions of contemporary art by indigenous artists have become regular features of Canadian public art galleries. Yet, such “soft” inclusions—to use the words of Lee-Ann Martin and Lynda Jessup—have not resulted in the revision of institutional practices that would produce the systemic changes necessary to begin decolonizing art institutions (i.e., curatorial departments, regular acquisitions, training, and revision of collecting mandates). While the artists included in Decolonize Me might be familiar from recent exhibitions, the catalogue essays bring a resoundingly critical perspective on the state of contemporary indigenous art in the twenty-first century. Igloliorte’s opening curatorial essay sets the tone by asserting the importance of claiming indigenous identity and refusing to accept the tropes of hybrid, post-Indian, or transnational identities that erase the specificity of indigenous experience and histories. Indeed, a recurring theme across both the essays and artworks is the political necessity of claiming not only indigenous space—a call made exceedingly clear in Croft’s essay on Aboriginal struggles for recognition in Australia—but also indigenous voice. This voice can no longer be simply representational, an example of Canadian diversity. As Loft argues, privileging indigenous voice means building on traditional knowledge to produce methodologies and theoretical approaches that not only permit a full understanding of Aboriginal [End Page 287] art making and thought, but also reverse the colonialist discourses that continue to shape museums and universities. Loft’s discussion of the centrality of decolonizing the art history discipline is especially pertinent here. He underlines the necessity of moving beyond soft inclusion within an existing canon, arguing instead that a decolonized art history requires a fundamental questioning of aesthetic values and analytical frameworks in order to build an indigenous art history that produces what he describes as “self-defining narratives of art and culture.” With its combination of politically sophisticated artworks and intellectually rigorous essays, Decolonize Me provides the beginning of a roadmap for such an important and necessary revision. Anne Whitelaw Concordia University Montreal, Quebec Copyright © 2014 Center for Great Plains Studies, University of Nebraska–Lincoln

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.345
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGreat plains quarterlySame topicCultural Heritage Management and PreservationFrench-language works237,207