SENSORY SIGNAL PROCESSING ISSUES IN A TELEMEDICINE SYSTEM
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A telemedicine system will provide sustainable, comprehensive, low-cost, fast, private, and convenient access to medical consultation and diagnosis for patients from remote locations. The telemedicine system addressed in this paper consists of a sensor jacket, which is worn by the patient for medical monitoring. The signals sensed through the jacket are processed and transmitted through a public telecommunication link, to a medical professional in a hospital at distance. The medical professional interacts with the patient through audio and video links, and simultaneously examines the data transmitted by the monitoring system. Medical assessment, diagnosis, and prescription are carried out on this basis. Sensing and signal processing are paramount to providing the patient data to the medical professional in an accurate and effective manner. This paper presents some relevant issues and techniques. Specific examples of electrocardiograms and respiratory signals are provided to illustrate the applicable signal conditioning approaches. Results are presented to demonstrate the feasibility and the effectiveness of these methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it