MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2019160358 · doi:10.1063/1.2149164

Initial stage of InAs growth on Si (001) studied by high-resolution transmission electron microscopy

2005· article· en· W2019160358 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Physics · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSemiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersArmy Research OfficeUniversity of California, Los Angeles
KeywordsTransmission electron microscopyMonolayerMolecular beam epitaxyMaterials scienceElectron microscopeCondensed matter physicsSubstrate (aquarium)Relaxation (psychology)CrystallographyEpitaxyIsland growthOpticsLayer (electronics)ChemistryNanotechnologyGeologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The initial stage of InAs growth on Si (001) substrate was studied via high-resolution transmission electron microscopy analysis. InAs of thickness less than 1 monolayer grown by molecular beam epitaxy was found to form islands at the onset of the growth, i.e., it follows the Volmer–Weber growth mode. By the introduction of 60° and 90° dislocations, the misfit strain was relieved at the early growth stage for island size as small as 10nm. The average distance between the 60° dislocations is approximately 2nm, indicating nearly complete strain relaxation. The shape evolution of individual islands reveals the transition from pyramidal shape with (111) facets for island diameters smaller than 15nm to dome shape for island diameters larger than 20nm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.702

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it