MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2019166547 · doi:10.1080/10238160412331299960

Structural Studies on New Superionic (AgI) <sub>0.8</sub> –(NaPO <sub>3</sub> ) <sub>0.2</sub> and (AgI) <sub>0.7</sub> –(NaPO <sub>3</sub> ) <sub>0.3</sub> at Room Temperature

2005· article· en· W2019166547 on OpenAlexaff
Agus Purwanto, Takashi Kamiyama, Akinori Hoshikawa, Stefanus Harjo, Evvy Kartini, M. F. Collins, Takashi Sakuma

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neutron Research · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicGlass properties and applications
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceCrystallographyCondensed matter physicsChemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Room temperature powder neutron diffractions have been performed to investigate the structure of (AgI) 0.8 – (NaPO 3 ) 0.2 and (AgI) 0.7 –(NaPO 3 ) 0.3 composites consisting of AgI crystalline precipitated in a glassy NaPO 3 network. Unlike (AgI) 0.8 –(NaPO 3 ) 0.2 and most silver-based superionic materials, (AgI) 0.7 –(NaPO 3 ) 0.3 contains Ag 5 IP 2 O 7 instead of βAgI and less γAgI. The diffuse background levels of both composites are similar and largely dominated by NaPO 3 amorphous phase.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.002
Bibliometrics0.0030.004
Science and technology studies0.0050.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.004
Open science0.0040.003
Research integrity0.0020.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Neutron ResearchSame topicGlass properties and applicationsFrench-language works237,207