MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2019194473 · doi:10.15381/rpb.v17i2.25

Vertebrados naturalizados en el Perú: historia y estado del conocimiento

2010· article· en· W2019194473 on OpenAlex
E. Daniel Cossíos

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Peruana de Biología · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBat Biology and Ecology Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNaturalizationGeographyBiodiversityWildlifeEcologySubject (documents)EthnologyBiologyHistoryPolitical scienceLibrary scienceComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Despite the importance of the impacts of the exotic species on the native biodiversity, these have been little studied in South America. In Peru, the information published on the subject is scarce and is many times restricted to gray literature, complicating the analysis of the problem and the wildlife management. In this publication 23 species of vertebrates naturalized in Peru were identified, and the known information on its dispersion in the country, current distribution and impacts on natural environments was summarized. In addition, 8 species that were object of failed intents of introduction to natural environments or whose naturalized populations were extinguished were identified, as well as 10 species of vertebrates whose naturalization is probable but should be verified. This information could be the base for the creation of a research plan on the naturalized vertebrates in Peru and their impacts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.503
Threshold uncertainty score0.938

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it