MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2019195655 · doi:10.7202/603132ar

SATO-CALIBRAGE : présentation d’un outil d’assistance au choix et à la rédaction de textes pour l’enseignement

2009· article· fr· W2019195655 on OpenAlex
François Daoust, Léo Laroche, Lise Ouellet

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue québécoise de linguistique · 2009
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicWriting and Handwriting Education
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesRedactionPhilosophyLexicographyArtPolitical scienceLinguisticsTheology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Depuis quelques années, un projet conjoint mené par l’Université du Québec à Montréal et le ministère de l’Éducation porte sur le développement d’un indice de lisibilité des textes, appelé SATO-CALIBRAGE. Des préoccupations de choix et de rédaction de textes en contexte scolaire ont été à l’origine du projet. Dans cet article, de nature descriptive, on présente l’application SATO-CALIBRAGE et on explique la méthodologie qui a été adoptée en exposant les dispositifs linguistique et mathématique qui ont été mis en place. L’indice lui-même et la façon de le calculer sont aussi présentés. En outre, quelques exemples d’utilisations en didactique, en évaluation et en rédaction sont fournis afin d’aider à comprendre les contextes d’utilisation éventuels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.597
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.318 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it