MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2019202918 · doi:10.1109/glocom.2009.5425799

Cramer-Rao Bound for NDA DOA Estimates of Square QAM-Modulated Signals

2009· article· en· W2019202918 on OpenAlexaff
Faouzi Bellili, Sonia Ben Hassen, Sofiène Affes, Alex Stéphenne

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicDirection-of-Arrival Estimation Techniques
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche Scientifique
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCramér–Rao boundQuadrature amplitude modulationQAMUpper and lower boundsMathematicsAdditive white Gaussian noiseExpression (computer science)AlgorithmSignal-to-noise ratio (imaging)Square (algebra)White noiseFisher informationModulation (music)Estimation theoryComputer scienceStatisticsPhysicsMathematical analysisAcousticsBit error rateDecoding methodsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper addresses the stochastic Cramer-Rao lower bound (CRLB) for the non-data-aided (NDA) direction of arrival (DOA) estimation of square quadrature amplitude (QAM)-modulated signals when the transmitted symbols are supposed to be completely unknown to the receiver. These signals are assumed to be corrupted by additive white circular complex Gaussian noise (AWCCGN). The channel is supposed to be slowly time-varying so that it can be assumed constant over the observation interval. The main contribution of this paper consists in deriving an explicit expression for the Fisher information matrix (FIM) in the case of a single square QAM modulated waveform and an analytical expression for the stochastic CRLB of the NDA DOA estimates. It will be shown that the achievable performance on the DOA estimates hold almost the same irrespectively of the modulation order.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.583
Threshold uncertainty score0.491

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicDirection-of-Arrival Estimation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207