MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2019224463 · doi:10.1002/mrm.21187

Correction for geometric distortion and N/2 ghosting in EPI by phase labeling for additional coordinate encoding (PLACE)

2007· article· en· W2019224463 on OpenAlexaff
Qing‐San Xiang, Frank Q. Ye

Bibliographic record

VenueMagnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBlind Source Separation Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGhostingEncoding (memory)Distortion (music)Computer sciencePhase (matter)Artificial intelligenceComputer visionPhysicsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Echo-planar imaging (EPI) is vulnerable to geometric distortion and N/2 ghosting. These artifacts can be analyzed with an intuitive k-t space tool, and here we propose a simple method for their correction. In a slightly modified additional EPI acquisition, we sample the k-t space with a shift in k(y) by adding a small area to the phase-encoding (PE) gradient. Physically, the added gradient area creates a relative phase ramp across the object and directly encodes the undistorted original y-coordinate of each voxel into a phase difference between two distorted complex images, in a method called "phase labeling for additional coordinate encoding" (PLACE). The phase information is then used to map the mismapped signals back to their original locations for geometric and intensity correction. Smoothing of expanded complex data matrix effectively reduces noise in the differential phase map and allows subpixel warping. The two acquired images can also be averaged to effectively suppress the N/2 ghost. Efficient correction for both artifacts can be achieved with three acquisitions. These acquisitions can also serve as reference scans to correct for geometric distortion and/or N/2 ghost artifacts on all images in a time series. The technique was successfully demonstrated in phantom and animal studies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations132
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMagnetic Resonance in MedicineSame topicBlind Source Separation TechniquesFrench-language works237,207