MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2019228206 · doi:10.3905/jpe.2007.699060

Venture Capital in Privatization Deals in Emerging Markets

2007· article· en· W2019228206 on OpenAlex
Darek Klonowski

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Private Equity · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicPrivate Equity and Venture Capital
Canadian institutionsBrandon University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVenture capitalPrivate equityBusinessPrivate equity firmEmerging marketsInvestment (military)Social venture capitalEquity (law)FinanceComplementary assetsMarket economyPrivate capitalCapital (architecture)Private sectorPrivate equity secondary marketFinancial systemEconomicsIndustrial organizationProduction (economics)Economic growth

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The venture capital industry in Poland represents one of the most dynamic investment markets in the emerging economies of Central and Eastern Europe (CEE). However, in spite of significant growth of the private sector, the most significant source of deals came from privatizing state-owned firms. This article describes the process of investing in a state-owned firm by five venture capital funds operating in the CEE region. It focuses on some unique challenges related to investing in these types of firms. <b>TOPICS:</b>Private equity, emerging, other real assets, technical analysis

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.228
Threshold uncertainty score0.529

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it