Antibody-Free Reading of the Histone Code Using a Simple Chemical Sensor Array
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The histone code refers to the complex network of histone post-translational modifications that control gene expression and are of high interest as drivers of a large number of human diseases. We report here on a mix-and-match toolkit of readily available dyes and calixarene host molecules that can be combined to form dye-displacement sensors that respond to a wide variety of cationic peptides. Using the data from only two or three such simple supramolecular sensors as a chemical sensor array produces fingerprints of data that discriminate robustly among many kinds of histone code elements. "Reads" that are accomplished include the discrimination of unmethylated, mono-, di-, and trimethylated lysines on a single histone tail sequence, identification of different modifications and combinations of modifications on a single histone tail sequence, identification of a single modification type in several different sequence contexts, and identification of isomeric dimethylarginine modifications. Reads that are sometimes troublesome for antibodies are achieved. We also report on the ability of the sensor array to report simultaneously on the concentrations and identities of histone modifications. This sensor array discriminates between post-translationally modified analytes without being limited to partners that contain a single, programmed binding interaction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it