MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2019305218 · doi:10.1071/rdv24n1ab90

90 INTRACELLULAR REACTIVE OXYGEN SPECIES IN BOVINE EMBRYOS CULTURED IN VITRO WITH CATALASE UNDER VARIOUS OXYGEN TENSIONS

2011· article· en· W2019305218 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Nildicéia Aparecida Rocha, B. C. S. Leão, M. F. Accorsi, Gisele Zoccal Mingoti

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Biology and Fertility
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCatalaseReactive oxygen speciesOxidative stressChemistrySuperoxideIntracellularHydrogen peroxideAntioxidantBiochemistryGlutathioneAndrologyEnzymeMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), such as superoxide anion (O2–), hydroxyl radical (OH–) hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and organic peroxides, is a normal process that occurs in the cellular mitochondrial respiratory chain. The high oxygen tension in in vitro culture (IVC) conditions is believed to induce oxidative stress, as a result of increase in ROS intracellular production, that can be correlated with embryonic developmental failure. Supplementation with antioxidants during IVC appears to increase the resistance of bovine embryos to the oxidative stress and consequently improve embryo development. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of antioxidant (catalase) and oxygen tensions during IVC on the embryonic development and quantification of intracellular ROS. Cumulus–oocyte complexes (COC; n = 337) were in vitro matured (IVM) in TCM-199 supplemented with 0.2 mM pyruvate, 25 mM sodium bicarbonate, 75 µg mL–1 gentamicin, 10% FCS and hormones for 24 h at 38.5°C and 5% CO2 in air. Then they were fertilized and the presumptive zygotes were cultured in SOFaa medium without (control) or with 100 UI catalase (CAT) for 7 days at 38.5°C in one of 2 types of humified atmosphere: 5% CO2 in air (˜20% O2) or in gaseous mixture (7% O2, 5% CO2 and 88% N2). The cleavage rate was evaluated at 72 hours post-insemination (hpi) and the embryonic development at 168 hpi. At this time, the level of intracellular ROS was measured using the fluorescent probe 6-carboxy-2',7'-dichlorodihydrofluorescein diacetate (H2DCFDA; Molecular Probes, Invitrogen, Oakville, Canada), at 5 µM (Bain et al. 2011 Reprod. Fertil. Dev.23, 561–575). Stained embryos were imaged immediately using an inverted microscope and analysed by Q-Capture Pro image software (QImaging, Surrey, BC, Canada). The signal intensity values of embryos were subtracted by the average of backgrounds in the images. Embryo development was analysed by chi-squared test and means of the intensity of fluorescence were compared by ANOVA followed by Tukey's test (P < 0.05). The cleavage rates were 84.04%a (control 20% O2), 77.55%a (CAT 20% O2), 77.03%a (control 7% O2) and 71.83%a (CAT 7% O2). The embryonic development rates were 40.43%a (control 20% O2), 33.67%a (CAT 20% O2), 20.27%b (control 7% O2) and 16.90%b (CAT 7% O2). The fluorescent intensity were 3.9 ± 0.4a (control 20% O2), 1.8 ± 0.2b (CAT 20% O2), 2.7 ± 0.2ab (control 7% O2) and 2.8 ± 0.2ab (CAT 7% O2). Although catalase did not significantly affect blastocyst frequencies (P > 0.05), embryo development was adversely affected by reduced O2 tension (P < 0.05). H2DCFDA staining indicated a significant (P < 0.05) reduction in the levels of intracellular ROS within embryos cultured with catalase under 20% O2 compared with the control group in the same O2 tension. Additionally, a consistent but insignificant reduction in intracellular ROS within embryos cultured under 7% O2 was found. We can conclude that supplementation with catalase to IVC medium at 20% O2 is suitable for lowering intracellular ROS levels in IVP bovine embryos, without lowering the rates of blastocysts production. This finding corroborates with theory that antioxidants are beneficial to embryo quality. Alta Genetics Brazil, Deoxi Biotecnologia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.477
Threshold uncertainty score0.819

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReproduction Fertility and DevelopmentSame topicReproductive Biology and FertilityFrench-language works237,207