Nanoporous Au: A high yield strength material
Why is this work in the frame?
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.
Full frame distilled prediction
Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
- Candidate categories
- none
- Consensus categories
- none
- Domain
- Candidate signal: noneConsensus signal: none
- Study design
- Candidate signal: Bench or experimentalConsensus signal: Bench or experimental
- Genre
- Candidate signal: EmpiricalConsensus signal: Empirical
- Teacher disagreement score
- 0.023
- Threshold uncertainty score
- 0.566
- Validation status
machine_predicted_unvalidated·codex-gemma-dda1882f352a
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
- Teacher spread
- 0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
- Validation status
score_only:v0-immature-baseline· verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it
Abstract
The plastic deformation of nanoporous Au under compressive stress was studied by depth-sensing nanoindentation combined with scanning electron microscope characterization. The nanoporous Au investigated in the current study exhibits a relative density of 42%, and a spongelike morphology of interconnecting ligaments on a length scale of ∼100nm. The material is polycrystalline with a grain size on the order of 10–60nm. Microstructural characterization of residual indentation impressions reveals a localized densification via ductile (plastic) deformation under compressive stress and demonstrates the ductile behavior of Au ligaments. A mean hardness of 145(±11)MPa and a Young’s modulus of 11.1(±0.9)GPa was obtained from the analysis of the load-displacement curves. The hardness of investigated np-Au is ∼10 times higher than the hardness predicted by scaling laws of open-cell foams thus potentially opening a door to a class of high yield strength—low-density materials.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
The record
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Physics
- Topic
- Nanoporous metals and alloys
- Field
- Materials Science
- Canadian institutions
- not available
- Funders
- Lawrence Livermore National LaboratoryRyerson UniversityU.S. Department of Energy
- Keywords
- NanoindentationMaterials scienceComposite materialNanoporousIndentationCompressive strengthScanning electron microscopeYield (engineering)Deformation (meteorology)Elastic modulusCharacterization (materials science)Indentation hardnessMicrostructureNanotechnology
- Has abstract in OpenAlex
- yes