Robust inference for mixed censored and binary response models with missing covariates
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In biomedical and epidemiological studies, often outcomes obtained are of mixed discrete and continuous in nature. Furthermore, due to some technical inconvenience or else, continuous responses are censored and also a few covariates cease to be observed completely. In this paper, we develop a model to tackle these complex situations. Our methodology is developed in a more general framework and provides a full-scale robust analysis of such complex models. The proposed robust maximum likelihood estimators of the model parameters are resistant to potential outliers in the data. We discuss the asymptotic properties of the robust estimators. To avoid computational difficulties involving irreducibly high-dimensional integrals, we propose a Monte Carlo method based on the Metropolis algorithm for approximating the robust maximum likelihood estimators. We study the empirical properties of these estimators in simulations. We also illustrate the proposed robust method using clustered data on blood sugar content from a clinical trial of individuals who were investigated for diabetes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.021 | 0.230 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it