MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Contribuição da nova sociologia econômica para repensar a economia no sentido do desenvolvimento sustentável

2007· article· pt· W2019394906 on OpenAlexaff
Benoît Lévesque

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista de Administração de Empresas · 2007
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial and Economic Solidarity
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceSociologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O artigo trata da eventual contribuição da nova sociologia econômica (NSE) para uma sociologia do desenvolvimento sustentável. Elaborada a partir do início dos anos 1980, a NSE busca dar conta da economia como totalidade social, o que já representa uma abertura ao desenvolvimento sustentável. Ademais, considerando a economia sob o prisma das instituições, das organizações, das redes e das formas de governança, ela reinscreve a economia no seio da sociedade. Isso seria trivial se essa concepção já fosse reconhecida por nossas sociedades e até mesmo por nossas disciplinas. Como nossa pesquisa documental é feita em duas etapas, tratamos na primeira parte do surgimento da NSE; na segunda parte, examinamos diversas abordagens que propõem uma reconstrução da economia como objeto sociológico. Em conclusão, nos perguntamos o que podemos apreender dessas abordagens, tendo em vista uma melhor compreensão do desenvolvimento sustentável.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.056

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0040.009
Scholarly communication0.0120.006
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.100
GPT teacher head0.381
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations23
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista de Administração de EmpresasSame topicSocial and Economic SolidarityFrench-language works237,207