MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Multi-Layer Iterative LDPC Decoding for Broadband Wireless Access Networks: A Recursive Shortening Algorithm

2013· article· en· W2019405212 on OpenAlexaff
Bo Rong, Yiyan Wu, Gilles Gagnon

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicError Correcting Code Techniques
Canadian institutionsCommunications Research Centre Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceDecoding methodsAlgorithmLow-density parity-check codeWirelessWireless broadbandTheoretical computer scienceWireless networkTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a novel multi-layer iterative decoding scheme using deterministic bits to lower the decoding threshold of LDPC codes in wireless multimedia communication systems. These deterministic bits serve as known information in the LDPC decoding process to reduce the redundancy during data transmission. Unlike the existing work, our proposed scheme addresses the controllable deterministic bits, such as MPEG null packets, rather than the widely investigated protocol headers. In particular, our multi-layer scheme integrates deterministic bit identification into LDPC decoding process. This integration is able to make significant performance improvement if adequate deterministic bits are discovered. We find that the length of deterministic bits may vary from time to time, and the exploring of deterministic bits is associated to a series of shortened parity matrices during the decoding iterations. Accordingly, we develop a recursive LDPC shortening algorithm to match the dynamic length and facilitate the iterative identification of deterministic bits. Simulation results show that our proposed scheme can achieve considerable gain in today's most popular broadband wireless access networks such as WiMAX.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.983
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0040.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Wireless CommunicationsSame topicError Correcting Code TechniquesFrench-language works237,207