MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2019406025 · doi:10.1081/jas-100107542

The Relationship Between Prescribed and Delivered Doses of Inhaled Corticosteroids in Adult Asthmatics

2001· article· en· W2019406025 on OpenAlexaff
Allan T. Luskin, Don A. Bukstein, Rami Ben‐Joseph

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Asthma · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery
Canadian institutionsGenome Prairie
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInhalationAsthmaDoseInhaled corticosteroidsAnesthesiaInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A model was developed to estimate the impact of adherence and inhalation technique over time on delivered doses of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) for asthmatics using metered-dose inhalers (MDIs) and dry powder inhalers (DPIs). Factors affecting inhalation technique include ongoing training, inhalation device, spacer use (with MDIs), and natural ability. Model parameters were derived from a literature review or were estimated from clinical experience. Analyses demonstrated that most patients receive a fraction of prescribed ICS doses over time. The model may be used to better understand the impact of increasing ICS dosages and to estimate the likelihood of patients being underdosed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.211

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.294
Teacher spread0.262 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of AsthmaSame topicInhalation and Respiratory Drug DeliveryFrench-language works237,207