MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2019464968 · doi:10.1021/jp9078772

Signatures of Exciton Dynamics and Carrier Trapping in the Time-Resolved Photoluminescence of Colloidal CdSe Nanocrystals

2009· article· en· W2019464968 on OpenAlexaff
Marcus Jones, Shun S. Lo, Gregory D. Scholes

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry C · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicQuantum Dots Synthesis And Properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotoexcitationPhotoluminescenceTrappingExcitonNanocrystalMaterials scienceChemical physicsMolecular physicsColloidDynamics (music)Condensed matter physicsNanotechnologyOptoelectronicsAtomic physicsChemistryPhysicsPhysical chemistryExcited state

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Surface effects significantly affect the photoexcitation dynamics of colloidal nanocrystals, but their influence is hard to study because of sample complexity and the typically small extinction coefficient of trap states. Using temperature-dependent time-resolved photoluminescence (PL) measurements, we investigate the perturbations induced by surface-localized carrier traps on the exciton dynamics of the nanocrystals. We present a model of carrier trapping that is based on Marcus’ electron-transfer theory and use it to accurately reproduce PL dynamics over a wide temperature range in five core−shell CdSe/CdZnS nanocrystal samples. The resulting pictures of carrier dynamics are then used to identify features in the PL data that may be used in subsequent experiments to reveal information about the energy and distribution of surface-localized trap states. We find that in certain cases, the shape of the ensemble distribution of trap energies can be accurately determined from data recorded at a single temperature that is easily identified from plots of average PL lifetime.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations147
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry CSame topicQuantum Dots Synthesis And PropertiesFrench-language works237,207