MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2019491195 · doi:10.7202/015538ar

Ils sont comme nous, mais... Relations de parenté et de genre entre Chimane et " gens de dedans "

2003· article· fr· W2019491195 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueAnthropologie et Sociétés · 2003
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAfrican Studies and Ethnography
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesGensPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

RÉSUMÉ Ils sont comme nous. mais... Relations de parenté et de genre entre Chimane et « gens de dedans » Parmi les êtres surnaturels qui peuplent l'univers des Chimane d'Amazonie bolivienne, les « gens de dedans » occupent une place essentielle. Leur connaissance est assurée par les chamanes qui trouvent chez eux des auxiliaires et des épouses dont ils ont des enfants. Ces esprits cumulent le statut de « parents » et d'« autres gens », deux catégories habituellement exclusives avec lesquelles les relations se jouent sur deux plans différents : celui de la parenté et celui des relations interethniques, lequel s'articule à l'ordre des sexes. Pour être pleinement saisies, les relations avec les « gens de dedans » doivent donc être envisagées sur ces deux plans, qui s'avèrent cependant congruents et concourent à mettre en place un tableau singulièrement équilibré. Mots clés : Daillant. chamanisme. parenté, alliances, relations hommes-femmes. Amazonie. Bolivie

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.788
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.205
GPT teacher head0.543
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it