MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2019495121 · doi:10.1109/naps.2014.6965389

Forecasting Solar Photovoltaic power production at the aggregated system level

2014· article· en· W2019495121 on OpenAlex
Yue Zhang, Marc Beaudin, Hamidreza Zareipour, David Wood

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSolar Radiation and Photovoltaics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotovoltaic systemAutoregressive integrated moving averageProduction (economics)Computer scienceSupport vector machineElectric power systemSolar powerPower (physics)Artificial neural networkRadial basis functionMeteorologyEngineeringTime seriesEnvironmental scienceArtificial intelligenceMachine learningGeographyElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Solar Photovoltaic power production has grown significantly over the past few years. California ISO is the first system operator in North America to make the data for aggregated system-level solar power production across its territory available on a regular basis. In this paper, we demonstrate the application of three well-established forecasting models to 24-hour-ahead prediction of solar power at the system level. The models investigated in this paper include Auto Regressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA), Radial Basis Function Neural Network (RBFNN), and Least Squares Support Vector Machine (LS-SVM). Numerical results and discussions are provided based on California ISO solar power data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.831
Threshold uncertainty score0.366

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSolar Radiation and PhotovoltaicsFrench-language works237,207