MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2019501004 · doi:10.1086/316863

G106.3+2.7: A Supernova Remnant in a Late Stage of Evolution

2000· article· en· W2019501004 on OpenAlexaff
S. Pineault, Gilles Joncas

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Astronomical Journal · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAstrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena
Canadian institutionsUniversité LavalDominion Astrophysical Observatory
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsSupernova remnantAstrophysicsSpectral indexAngular diameterSurface brightnessSupernovaH II regionInterstellar mediumHydrogen lineBrightnessAstronomySpectral lineGalaxyStar formationStars

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We report on observations of the candidate supernova remnant (SNR) G106.3+2.7 with the Dominion Radio Astrophysical Observatory's Synthesis Telescope in the continuum at both 408 and 1420 MHz and in the 21 cm line of neutral hydrogen. The general morphology of the object and its spectral index (α ≈ 0.57 ± 0.04, where Sν ∝ ν-α) confirm it as an SNR. The object consists of two distinct components, the head and the tail. The tail component is of lower surface brightness and has a marginally steeper spectral index than the head component. A deficiency of neutral hydrogen at an LSR velocity of about -105 km s-1 is most likely due to the effect of the SNR, suggesting that the SNR is expanding at a velocity of about 15 km s -1, it is at a kinematic distance of 12 kpc, and its largest angular extent is of the order of 200 pc. These parameters are shown to be consistent with a dynamical model in which the SNR is in a very late stage of its isothermal evolution, where the pressure inside the SNR is approaching the pressure of the ambient interstellar medium. We also describe the H II region Sh 141, which is about 20' north of G106.3+2.7.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.515
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations45
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Astronomical JournalSame topicAstrophysics and Cosmic PhenomenaFrench-language works237,207