MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

An Update on the Nonoperative Treatment of Patients with Metastastic Bone Disease

2001· review· en· W2019526100 on OpenAlexaff
Norman S. Schachar

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Orthopaedics and Related Research · 2001
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone health and treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineBone diseaseOsteolysisDiseaseRadiation therapyModalitiesSurgeryIntensive care medicineOsteoporosisInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bone metastases constitute a major problem in oncology because of their frequency and the therapeutic problems they present. Treatment indications depend on accurate diagnosis including histologic type, number, location, and sensitivity to treatment. New findings in the pathophysiology of bone metastases, new staging procedures, new treatment modalities, and better guidelines improve therapeutic effectiveness and the quality of life of patients. There are biologic and biomechanical indications for treatment. The goals of treatment are pain relief, restoration and maintenance of function, and the prevention of complications. The nonsurgical treatment of patients with metastatic bone disease includes analgesics, hormones, radiation therapy, cytotoxic drugs, radiopharmaceuticals, chemoablation, vertebroplasty, and bisphosphonates. The future of the treatment of patients with metastatic bone disease may involve the identification of biochemical markers. The author presents an overview of the current scientific concepts of metastatic bone disease and indications and specific strategies for nonoperative treatment of patients with tumor-induced osteolysis from metastatic bone disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.201
GPT teacher head0.506
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations49
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Orthopaedics and Related ResearchSame topicBone health and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207