MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2019534768 · doi:10.1063/1.4723815

Liouvillian quasi-normal modes of Kerr-Newman black holes

2012· article· en· W2019534768 on OpenAlexaff
W. E. Couch, C. L. Holder

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Mathematical Physics · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPulsars and Gravitational Waves Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsRotating black holeEigenvalues and eigenvectorsScalar (mathematics)Normal modeMathematical physicsBlack hole (networking)Classical mechanicsRotation (mathematics)Quantum mechanicsMathematical analysisAngular momentumMathematicsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The radial differential equations associated with separable perturbations of Kerr-Newman black holes are known to admit Liouvillian (closed-form) solutions for constrained frequencies and black hole parameters. In this paper, we show that the parameter constraints are satisfied exactly in the case of no rotation and thereby obtain a countable infinity of exact purely damped quasi-normal modes of fields on a Reissner-Nordstrom background at special values of the black hole charge-mass ratio. We show that with rotation the parameter constraints for Liouvillian quasi-normal modes are satisfied approximately in two distinct physical scenarios, where analytical approximations for angular eigenvalues are known. We arrive at functional expressions for quasi-normal frequencies and wave-functions in the case of near-extremal slow rotation and in a particular case of highly damped scalar modes of Kerr and Kerr-Newman. In the near-extremal case, our formulas extend a recent result of Hod to electromagnetic and gravitational perturbations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.061
Threshold uncertainty score0.361

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.315 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Mathematical PhysicsSame topicPulsars and Gravitational Waves ResearchFrench-language works237,207