Cutaneous and Oral Eruption from Oral Exposure to Nickel in Dental Braces
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Oral eruptions due to nickel allergy are rare. A common presentation of intraoral contact dermatitis is the presence of lichenoid plaques on the buccal mucosa adjacent to the offending antigen. We report an unusual case of cutaneous and mucosal nickel allergy arising after placement of dental braces. An 11-year-old boy was referred by his orthodontist to the University of Minnesota Occupational and Contact Dermatitis Clinic to be evaluated for a possible metal allergy. The patient developed an itchy rash on his abdomen and under his wristwatch 1 week after dental braces were placed. He was diagnosed with allergic contact dermatitis from nickel. The patient avoided cutaneous nickel exposure and had a minimal resolution of his symptoms. One year later, the patient developed swelling and burning of the lips. Secondary to extreme discomfort, the braces, which contained nickel, titanium, and zinc, were removed. The patient underwent standard patch testing; the final reading at 96 hours showed a +++ reaction to nickel, palladium, cobalt chloride, and neomycin. The patient experienced relief of his oral symptoms after removal of the braces. No current relevance to palladium, cobalt, or neomycin has been found.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".