A Survey for Pulsating Hot B Subdwarfs in the Northern Hemisphere
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We present the final results of a survey to search for pulsating hot B subdwarf (sdB) stars. We picked our candidates on the basis of their values of T eff and log g , as estimated from available quantitative optical spectroscopy. With the help of a three-channel photometer, we gathered "white-light" light curves using a uniform sampling time of 10 s for a total of 74 stars. Our survey had a yield of ~5.4%, leading to the discovery of detectable luminosity variations in four objects: PG 1047+003, KPD 2109+4401, KPD 1930+2752, and PG 0014+067. For the light curves of the other 70 stars, we derive upper limits on the amplitudes of possible periodic signals (in the period window 20-1000 s) that range from ~0.05% of the mean brightness of the star at an apparent magnitude of y ~ 12 to ~0.20% at y ~ 15. We use our survey results as well as those of others to discuss the location and extent of the empirical instability "strip" for pulsating sdB stars in the log g - T eff diagram. We also address the question of the coexistence of pulsators and nonvariable stars in the same region of that diagram.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".