MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2019601866 · doi:10.4000/ethiquepublique.1467

Vieillir avec le VIH : enjeux éthiques autour d’une population invisible

2008· article· fr· W2019601866 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Bertrand Lebouché, Isabelle Wallach, Joseph J. Lévy

Bibliographic record

VenueÉthique Publique · 2008
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicAging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)HumanitiesPolitical scienceArtMedicineFamily medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Avec le développement des nouveaux traitements contre le VIH, le profil sociodémographique des personnes séropositives tend à se modifier et celles-ci sont de plus en plus nombreuses à se situer dans la catégorie d’âge des 50 ans et plus. Ce vieillissement s’accompagne de problèmes médicaux et psychosociaux spécifiques qui n’ont pas toujours donné lieu à des interventions ciblées. Cet article explore les enjeux éthiques que soulève cette situation ainsi que quelques pistes de solution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.383
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.338
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueÉthique PubliqueSame topicAging, Elder Care, and Social IssuesFrench-language works237,207