← all works
New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)
Why is this work in the frame?
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Canadian affiliationAn author listed a Canadian institution. This is the only route the usual frame has.
Abstract
No abstract. This is not a gap in this database — OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.
The record
- Venue
- European Journal of Cancer
- Topic
- Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
- Field
- Medicine
- Canadian institutions
- Queen's University
- Funders
- Medical Research Council
- Keywords
- GuidelineResponse Evaluation Criteria in Solid TumorsMedicineClinical trialClinical endpointPathologicalDiseaseTarget lesionProgressive diseaseMedical physicsRadiologyPathologyInternal medicine
- Has abstract in OpenAlex
- no