Entre soin et punition : la difficile coexistence entre le soin infirmier et la culture carcérale
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction/contexte : des résultats de recherche récents ont montré que l’exercice professionnel du personnel infirmier en milieux psychiatriques correctionnels est difficile dans la mesure où les opérations et la culture correctionnelles menacent le respect intégral de plusieurs aspects socioprofessionnels fondateurs des soins infirmiers. Objectifs : cet article de recherche porte sur les activités du personnel infirmier exerçant dans un milieu correctionnel dispensant des services de soins psychiatriques. Résultats : cette recherche, réalisée en milieu psychiatrique correctionnel canadien, entre 2006 et 2009, témoigne des défis auxquels est confronté le personnel infirmier exerçant dans un milieu correctionnel. Discussion/conclusion : nous croyons que les résultats de notre recherche constituent une étape supplémentaire et fondamentale dans la compréhension globale de l’expérience du personnel infirmier exerçant en milieux correctionnels.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.025 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.009 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.009 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".