Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study elaborates on the historical 'Insurance Plan' in 1905 of Cairo's European Quarter in comparison to its present situation in 2002. The objective is to pointout the future strategy of conservation. The comparison is conducted according to the criteria of: 1) urban structure, 2) building ownership and function, and 3) insurance and taxation policies. The essence of the'Ezbekieh Plaza' in 1905 synthesized the physical with the socio-economic structuring between the existing Native Town and the new European Quarter. The Municipal regulations in 1905 created a unified proportions designed for each zone of the European Quarter with characteristic European landscapes. Meanwhile, the real-estate taxation imposed on the free market, and the covered maintenance of building items by the 'Insurance Plan' in 1905 worked effectively to sustain the functioning of the European colony. The nationalization policies since 1952, however, have forced the quarter to deteriorate through the 'Rent Control' policy and the lack of enforcing the function of historical buildings and open spaces. The conservation in 2002 has no socio-economic insurance or taxation, and buildings are redeveloped into different heights and façade characteristics due to the change of building regulations. The present changes are facilitated in the light of the overshadowed 'Insurance Plan' in 1952.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".