MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2019647036 · doi:10.1002/mrd.20297

Efficiency of gene transfection into donor cells for nuclear transfer of bovine embryos

2005· article· en· W2019647036 on OpenAlexaff
Sung‐Lim Lee, Sun‐A Ock, Jae Gyu Yoo, B. Mohana Kumar, S.Y. Choe, Gyu‐Jin Rho

Bibliographic record

VenueMolecular Reproduction and Development · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAnimal Genetics and Reproduction
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiologyTransfectionEmbryoGeneCell biologyGene transferGeneticsMolecular biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The production of transgenic (TG) animals by somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) has proven to be a more efficient method than other methods, such as gene injection or sperm mediation. The present study was intended to evaluate the efficiency of gene transfection by Effectene (Qiagen, Inc.), a lipid-based reagent compared to electroporation in fetal-derived fibroblast cells (FFC), cumulus-derived fibroblast cells (CFC), and adult ear skin-derived fibroblast cells (AEFC). Parameters compared were factors such as chromosome abnormality, gene expression, and the incidence of apoptosis. Further, the TG embryos with transfected donor cells generated by electroporation or Effectene were compared to IVF and SCNT embryos in terms of rates of cleavage, blastocyst formation, and blastocyst cell number. Most of the cells (>80%) at confluence were at G0/G1 and considered to be suitable nuclear donors for cloning. Transfection with a plasmid containing the enhanced green fluorescent protein (pEGFP-N1) gene into FFC did not increase the incidence of chromosomal abnormalities. The rates of apoptosis in different cell types transfected with pEGFP-N1 were 3.3%-5.0%, and the values did not differ among groups. In addition, the rates of apoptosis in various cells between 5-7 and 20-22 cell passages did not differ. However, the efficiency of gene transfecton into FFC by Effectene reagent (14.2 +/- 1.7) was significantly (P < 0.05) higher than that obtained by electroporation (5.1 +/- 1.0). Among various cell types, the efficiency of gene transfection by Effectene and eletroporation of FFC (14.2 +/- 1.7 and 5.1 +/- 1.0, respectively) was significantly (P < 0.05) higher than transfection of CFC and AEFC by either method (9.4 +/- 1.5 and 3.3 +/- 0.8, 8.8 +/- 0.7, and 2.1 +/- 0.4, respectively). In TG embryos produced by SCNT with electroporation and Effectene, the rates of cleavage and blastocyst formation were significantly lower (P < 0.05) than those of IVF controls, but rates did not differ between SCNT and TG embryos. Similarly, significantly higher (P < 0.05) total cell numbers in day-8 blastocysts were observed in IVF controls than those in SCNT and TG embryos, but did not differ between SCNT and TG (136 vs. approximately 110, respectively). The results demonstrated that, though there were no difference in the rates of chromosomal aneuploidy and the incidence of apoptosis among various cell types, transfected with or without pEGFP-N1, FFC were the cell type most effectively transfected and Effectene was a suitable agent for transfection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMolecular Reproduction and DevelopmentSame topicAnimal Genetics and ReproductionFrench-language works237,207