Concept de soi et statut sociométrique des adolescentes et des adolescents membres des minorités raciales au sein des écoles françaises de l’Ontario
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article1 traite du concept de soi et du statut sociométrique d'adolescentes et d'adolescents membres des minorités raciales et qui fréquentent des écoles françaises de l'Ontario. L'évaluation du concept de soi a reposé sur la version française de deux tests reconnus: celui de Harter ( 1985) et celui de Marsh ( 1988); l'évaluation du statut sociométrique a fait appel à la technique de nominations de pairs. Les résultats significatifs concernent le statut sociométrique; ils indiquent a) que les filles des minorités raciales sont choisies moins souvent comme partenaires que les filles de la majorité; b) que l'appartenance à une minorité raciale n'affecte pas les choix sociométriques des garçons, ni le rejet social des filles et des garçons; c) qu'il existe des différences liées au pays d'origine des élèves.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".