MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2019660423 · doi:10.1109/igarss.2012.6350394

SWE retrieval over a forested watershed using a snow emission model inversion algorithm

2012· article· en· W2019660423 on OpenAlexaffabout
François Vachon, Danielle De Sève, Y. Choquette, Frédéric Guay

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicCryospheric studies and observations
Canadian institutionsHydro-Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSnowWatershedInversion (geology)HydropowerEnvironmental scienceHydroelectricityHydrology (agriculture)AlgorithmRemote sensingMeteorologyComputer scienceGeologyGeomorphologyEngineeringGeographyGeotechnical engineeringStructural basin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For Hydro-Québec, the water contains within the snow-pack represents more than 30% of its annual energy reserve. Moreover, 97% of Hydro-Quebec's power production is hydroelectric. Thus, the knowledge of the maximum value of snow water equivalent is a crucial information to maximise hydropower generation for all Hydro-Québec's watersheds. To improve monitoring snow properties in forested areas, a model inversion scheme is adapted to incorporate the information provided by the total volume map produced by the Canadian Forest Service. The first results show that the inversion algorithm can quantify adequately the snow water equivalent during the winter period over a forested watershed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.325
Threshold uncertainty score0.647

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCryospheric studies and observations→French-language works237,207→