MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2019666114 · doi:10.1109/cdc.2012.6426082

Newton-Geodesic HMP algorithms for the optimization of hybrid systems and the geometric properties of hybrid value functions

2012· article· en· W2019666114 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicOptimization and Variational Analysis
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeodesicExtension (predicate logic)AlgorithmHybrid systemHybrid algorithm (constraint satisfaction)Computer scienceMathematicsMathematical optimizationMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper provides algorithms for the optimization of autonomous hybrid systems based on the geometrical properties of switching manifolds. The first and second sections of the paper introduce optimal hybrid control systems and the third section presents the Newton-Geodesic-Hybrid Minimum Principle (HMP) which is an extension of the Gradient Geodesic-HMP algorithm in [4]. In the fourth section, we extend the analysis yielding the Newton-Geodesic-HMP algorithm to relate the difference of the curvatures of the ambient and switching manifolds to second order variations of the hybrid value function. Finally an example is given to illustrate the results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.959
Threshold uncertainty score0.174

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicOptimization and Variational AnalysisFrench-language works237,207