Prevalence and incidence of hypertension in a population cohort of people aged 65 years or older in Spain
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the prevalence and incidence of hypertension in a Spanish cohort of people aged at least 65 years with 13 years' follow-up. This is the first study to provide age-adjusted and sex-adjusted incidence rates of hypertension in a Mediterranean-based population aged 65 years or older. METHODS: Population-based longitudinal study set in the city of Leganes, Spain. The cross-sectional prevalence of hypertension was estimated using data available for the 1993, 1995, 1999, and 2006 cohorts. The incidence density (incident cases of hypertension/person-years) was calculated for 522 individuals without hypertension at baseline. Individuals were classified as hypertensive if they were taking physician-prescribed medication for hypertension or if their blood pressure was equal to or greater than 140/90 mmHg. RESULTS: Hypertension prevalence increased progressively with time, from 53.5% in 1993 to 86.2% in 2006. In all four waves, women had a higher prevalence of hypertension than men (P < 0.05). The total incidence density of hypertension was 7.6 [95% confidence interval (CI) 6.6-8.7] cases per 100 person-years of follow-up: 9.0 (95% CI 7.2-11.2) in women and 6.9 (95% CI 5.8-8.3) in men. In all age groups, the incidence density was nonsignificantly higher in women than in men (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Both the incidence and prevalence of hypertension in this population of people aged at least 65 years were high, and the prevalence increased dramatically over time, especially among women.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".