Nitride Formation by Thermolysis of a Kinetically Stable Niobium Dinitrogen Complex
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The reduction of [P(2)N(2)]NbCl (where [P(2)N(2)] = PhP(CH(2)SiMe(2)NSiMe(2)CH(2))(2)PPh) with KC(8) under a dinitrogen atmosphere generates the paramagnetic dinuclear dinitrogen complex ([P(2)N(2)]Nb)(2)(mu-N(2)) (2). Complex 2 has been characterized crystallographically and by EPR spectroscopy. Variable-temperature magnetic susceptibility measurements indicate that 2 displays antiferromagnetic coupling between two Nb(IV) (d(1)) centers. A density functional theory calculation on the model complex [(PH(3))(2)(NH(2))(2)Nb](2)(mu-N(2)) was performed. Thermolysis of ([P(2)N(2)]Nb)(2)(mu-N(2)) in toluene generates the paramagnetic bridging nitride species where one N atom of the dinitrogen ligand inserts into the macrocycle backbone to form [P(2)N(2)]Nb(mu-N)Nb[PN(3)] (3) (where [PN(3)] = PhPMe(CHSiMe(2)NSiMe(2)CH(2)P(Ph)CH(2)SiMe(2)NSiMe(2)N)). Complex 3 has been characterized in the solid state as well as by variable-temperature magnetic susceptibility measurements. The reaction of ([P(2)N(2)]Nb)(2)(mu-N(2)) with phenylacetylene displaces the dinitrogen fragment to generate a paramagnetic eta(2)-alkyne complex, [P(2)N(2)]Nb(eta(2)-HCCPh) (4).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it