MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

QUETIAPINE FOR SEXUALLY INAPPROPRIATE BEHAVIOR IN DEMENTIA

2000· letter· en· W2019695248 on OpenAlexaff
Chris MacKnight, Carlos Rojas‐Fernandez

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2000
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSchizophrenia research and treatment
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineQuetiapineMigrainePsychiatryDementiaPediatricsInternal medicineSchizophrenia (object-oriented programming)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To the Editor: The treatment of sexually inappropriate behavior by patients with dementia is largely a matter of trial and error.1 We wish to report an excellent response to an 4 atypical antipsychotic. The patient is an 85-year-old man whose wife described a slow cognitive decline for several years, followed by a perioperative stroke 3 years before our consultation. His cognition deteriorated abruptly at that time. Since the stroke he has continued in slow decline, though with periods of fluctuation, and he has also developed parkinsonism with rigidity and the characteristic posture and gait. Other conditions are atrial fibrillation and orthostatic hypotension. Medications at presentation were aspirin, betahistine, and dimenhydrinate for sleep (these last two were stopped). His Mini-Mental State Exam score was 18/30 On a daily basis, the patient attempted to have sexual relations with his wife, who resisted verbally. He was unsuccessful in these attempts and would then masturbate for several hours, to the point of self-injury. He was told by his physician that this behavior was unwelcome, and although his feelings were natural, his wife could no longer participate. Cyproterone 100 mg twice daily was tried for 2 weeks with no effect. Paroxetine 5 mg once daily was prescribed, but because of diarrhea only two doses were taken. Quetiapine 25 mg at bedtime was prescribed. Within 2 days the behavior had stopped, and it has not recurred in 2 months of follow-up. Drowsiness occurred when the dose was increased to 50 mg, so he has remained on 25 mg. His parkinsonism and orthostatic hypotension did not worsen. Quetiapine has been demonstrated to be safe in older people in open-label trials in psychotic disorders and in Parkinson's disease.2,3 Despite its effects on various receptors in the brain (e.g., D1, D2, H1, 5HT2a, alpha1, and others) quetiapine has the advantage (at both low and high doses) of relative selectivity for mesolimbic compared with mesostriatal dopaminergic neurons, making it an attractive choice for older adults with parkinsonism or Parkinson's disease.4 An important dosing consideration for quetiapine in older patients is that its clearance is decreased by approximately 40%. Low starting doses and slow dose titration are, therefore, necessary. Recognizing that anecdotes are the least favored form of evidence in the practice of medicine, our experience suggests that quetiapine in very small doses is safe and effective for this difficult problem of sexually inappropriate behavior.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0030.000
Research integrity0.0110.011
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.283 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations29
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the American Geriatrics SocietySame topicSchizophrenia research and treatmentFrench-language works237,207