The chemical chaperone CFcor-325 repairs folding defects in the transmembrane domains of CFTR-processing mutants
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Most patients with CF (cystic fibrosis) express a CFTR [CF TM (transmembrane) conductance regulator] processing mutant that is not trafficked to the cell surface because it is retained in the endoplasmic reticulum due to altered packing of the TM segments. CL4 (cytoplasmic loop 4) connecting TMs 10 and 11 is a 'hot-spot' for CFTR processing mutations. The chemical chaperone CFcor-325 (4-cyclohexyloxy-2-{1-[4-(4-methoxy-benezenesulphonyl)piperazin-1-yl]-ethyl}-quinazoline) rescued most CL4 mutants. To test if CFcor-325 promoted correct folding of the TMDs (TM domains), we selected two of the CL4 mutants (Q1071P and H1085R) for disulphide cross-linking analysis. Pairs of cysteine residues that were cross-linked in mature wild-type CFTR were introduced into mutants Q1071P and H1085R. The cross-linking patterns of the Q1071P or H1085R double cysteine mutants rescued with CFcor-325 were similar to those observed with mature wild-type double cysteine proteins. These results show that CFcor-325 rescued CFTR mutants by repairing the folding defects in the TMDs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".