H<sub>1</sub>‐antihistaminic activity of cetirizine and fexofenadine in allergic children
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The clinical pharmacology of H1‐antihistamines has not yet been optimally studied in children and other special groups of patients. Our objective was to determine the onset, extent, and duration of H1‐antihistaminic activity of cetirizine and fexofenadine in the pediatric population. We performed a prospective, randomized, placebo‐controlled, double‐blind, crossover, single‐dose study of these H1‐antihistamines in 15 allergic children, mean±SEM age 8.8±0.5 years. We used suppression of the histamine‐induced wheal and flare as the primary outcome. Compared with pre‐dose baseline, cetirizine 10 mg suppressed the wheals significantly (p≤0.05) from 2 to 24 h and the flares significantly from 1 to 24 h, achieving 77±SEM 10% to 86±9% suppression of the wheal from 2 to 7 h and 85±6% to 88±6% suppression of the flare from 2 to 24 h, inclusive. Compared with baseline, fexofenadine 30 mg did not suppress the wheals or flares significantly at any time, achieving 40±9% to 54±9% wheal suppression from 2 to 7 h and 45±11% to 68±9% flare suppression from 2 to 7 h, inclusive. Compared with placebo, cetirizine suppressed the wheals and flares significantly from 2 to 24 h. Compared with placebo, fexofenadine suppressed the wheals significantly at 4 and 6 h, and the flares from 4 to 7 h. Cetirizine suppressed the wheals and flares significantly more than fexofenadine at 2 h (wheals), and at 3 and 24 h (flares). Placebo did not suppress the wheals and flares significantly at any time. In children age 6–11 years, cetirizine 10 mg has a rapid onset of H1‐antihistaminic activity, a 24‐h duration of action, and greater H1‐activity than fexofenadine 30 mg. Higher doses of fexofenadine should be tested in children.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".