MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Role of the Neuromuscular System in the Development, Progression, and Rehabilitation of Osteoarthritis of the Knee

2007· review· en· W2019742080 on OpenAlexaff
Michael Berger, Timothy J. Doherty

Bibliographic record

VenueCritical Reviews in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine · 2007
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOsteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePhysical medicine and rehabilitationOsteoarthritisProprioceptionRehabilitationPhysical therapyPopulationMotor unitNeuromuscular diseaseDiseasePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this review is to examine current understanding of the relationship between the neuromuscular system and osteoarthritis of the knee joint. Although deficits in neuromuscular function are common in the normal aging population, they are also considerable and often of greater magnitude in patients with OA. The mechanisms responsible for the loss in muscle strength and proprioceptive acuity seen in knee OA may include those previously implicated in normal aging processes, such as changes to muscle and motor unit morphology. In addition, neural mechanisms contributing to strength loss, such as reduced central drive (voluntary activation of the quadriceps muscle) due to alterations in joint architecture, may occur independently of normal aging processes. Furthermore, evidence from a variety of study designs illustrates a possible role for sensorimotor dysfunction in the incidence and progression of the degenerative changes occurring in knee OA. Although the relevance of the neuromuscular system to the pathogenesis of disease is not fully understood, the effect of these deficits on pain and disability is well established and has widespread implications for the development and implementation of rehabilitation protocols. Clinicians should be aware of the limited use of generalized joint-specific strength exercise programs for rehabilitation because patients require individualized assessment for differences in systemic and local neuromuscular factors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.352
Teacher spread0.331 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCritical Reviews in Physical and Rehabilitation MedicineSame topicOsteoarthritis Treatment and MechanismsFrench-language works237,207