The Role of the Neuromuscular System in the Development, Progression, and Rehabilitation of Osteoarthritis of the Knee
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this review is to examine current understanding of the relationship between the neuromuscular system and osteoarthritis of the knee joint. Although deficits in neuromuscular function are common in the normal aging population, they are also considerable and often of greater magnitude in patients with OA. The mechanisms responsible for the loss in muscle strength and proprioceptive acuity seen in knee OA may include those previously implicated in normal aging processes, such as changes to muscle and motor unit morphology. In addition, neural mechanisms contributing to strength loss, such as reduced central drive (voluntary activation of the quadriceps muscle) due to alterations in joint architecture, may occur independently of normal aging processes. Furthermore, evidence from a variety of study designs illustrates a possible role for sensorimotor dysfunction in the incidence and progression of the degenerative changes occurring in knee OA. Although the relevance of the neuromuscular system to the pathogenesis of disease is not fully understood, the effect of these deficits on pain and disability is well established and has widespread implications for the development and implementation of rehabilitation protocols. Clinicians should be aware of the limited use of generalized joint-specific strength exercise programs for rehabilitation because patients require individualized assessment for differences in systemic and local neuromuscular factors.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".