MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2019742604 · doi:10.1287/inte.30.1.96.11617

An Asset and Liability Management System for Towers Perrin-Tillinghast

2000· article· en· W2019742604 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueINFORMS Journal on Applied Analytics · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInsurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management
Canadian institutionsCanadian General-Tower (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLiabilityAsset (computer security)PensionActuarial scienceBusinessPlan (archaeology)Investment (military)Asset managementGenerator (circuit theory)FinanceRisk managementRisk analysis (engineering)Computer sciencePower (physics)Computer security

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Towers Perrin-Tillinghast employs a stochastic asset-and-liability management system for helping its pension plan and insurance clients understand the risks and opportunities related to capital market investments and other major decisions. The system has three major components: (1) a stochastic scenario generator (CAP:Link); (2) a nonlinear optimization simulation model (OPT:Link); and (3) a flexible liability- and financial-reporting module (FIN:Link). Each part improves over existing technology as compared with traditional actuarial approaches. The integrated investment system links asset risks to liabilities so that company goals are best achieved. For example, US WEST saved $450 to $1,000 million in opportunity costs in its pension plan by following the advice of the asset-and-liability system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.930
Threshold uncertainty score0.831

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it