MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2019743860 · doi:10.1071/rdv18n2ab364

364 DISTRIBUTION OF OVULATION AND SUBSEQUENT EMBRYO PRODUCTION USING LUTROPIN AND ESTRADIOL-17ß FOR TIMED AI OF SUPERSTIMULATED BEEF FEMALES

2005· article· en· W2019743860 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueReproduction Fertility and Development · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicReproductive Physiology in Livestock
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEstrous cycleAnimal scienceOvulationCloprostenolGynecologyArtificial inseminationSemenMedicineAndrologyBiologyInternal medicinePregnancyHormone

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This experiment was designed to compare timing of ovulation and embryo production between traditional superstimulatory and AI methods and the use of additional treatments of Estradiol-17ß and pLH (Lutropin; Bioniche Animal Health, Belleville, Ontario, Canada) to facilitate timed AI in beef cows. A total of 31 mature cross-bred beef cows were randomly assigned three treatments. On Day 0, experimental cows were selected upon transrectal ultrasound evaluation for corpus leutum (>10 mm) prior to CIDR insertion plus 2.5 mg estradiol-17ß and 50 mg Progesterone i.m. Superstimulatory treatments with Folltropin-V (Bioniche Animal Health) began on Day 4 for 3.5 days (236 mg NIH-FSH-P10) in decreasing dosages (7 injections at 0700 and 1900). All cows received prostaglandin F (PGF) treatments of 625 mcg D-cloprostenol i.m. (Estrumate; Schering-Plough, Union, NJ, USA) in both AM and PM on Day 6, and CIDRs were removed in AM of Day 7, followed by the final injection of Folltropin. In addition, Heat Watch patches (Heat Watch; Cow Chips, Denver, CO, USA) were applied to optimize heat detection. Donors selected as control treatment were AI at 12 and 24 h post-onset of estrus (first mount) with frozen semen from the same bull. Donors selected on the Estradiol-17ß treatment received 1 mg i.m. 12 h after CIDR removal and timed AI at 24 and 36 h. Donors selected for Lutropin treatment received 12.5 mg (5cc i.m.) 24 h after CIDR removal and were timed AI at 12 and 24 h. All AI procedures used 2 units from the same bull. All cows were examined by ultrasonography every 8 h beginning 24 h post-CIDR removal and ending at 60 h to determine the time and distribution of ovulation. Ovulation was determined by the disappearance of follicles (>12 mm) from the prior examination. All AI and ultrasound procedures were performed by the same technician. There were no differences detected between the three treatments as evaluated by all the variables we studied (Table 1). However, donors treated with Lutropin tended to produced more viable embryos per collection and had a tighter degree of distribution of ovulations. Donors treated with Estradiol-17ß tended to have fewer viable embryos. More research is needed to determine if donors can be timed AI without regard to estrus. Table 1. Mean onset of estrus, distribution of ovulation, and embryo production in superstimulated beef donors treated with Estradiol-17ß, and Lutropin

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.827
Threshold uncertainty score0.292

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it