Lignosulfonate Separation Using Preparative Column Chromatography
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A two-step chromatographic process was developed for the fractionation of lignosulfonate (LS), a main component of sulfite effluence. LS fractions with low polydispersity were obtained, which enables detailed investigation into the relationship between structure and property of LS with different molecular weight ( M w ). Sephacryl S-100 was used for LS separation in the first step, and then Sephadex LH-20 and Sephacryl S-100 were chosen for further separation of LS fractions with M w below and above 6000 Da, respectively. Although the mechanism of column chromatographic separation of LS was mainly dependent on its molecular size, 0.20 mol/L of NaCl or NaNO 3 solution was needed in the mobile phase at pH 5.7 to minimize electrostatic interaction and polyelectrolyte effect. Compared with the polyelectrolyte effect, the electrostatic interaction was more important in the LS separation. Because the LS fractions of higher M w had a characteristic of low negative charge, a mobile phase with high flow rate and high pH value was suitable for separating LS fractions with high M w .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".